My second Green Crier article this week focused on our very own Prince Charlie’s opposition to GM crops.
The article:
Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, spoke up in opposition to GM crops in an interview with the Telegraph newspaper last week. Charles is known for his outspoken views, and he has previously advocated organic farming and alternative medicines, as well as criticising modern architecture and warning about the dangers of nanotechnology.
Charles has an organic farm on his Highgrove estate in Gloucestershire, and his criticisms of GM technology are twofold: he believes that relying on big corporations for the mass production of food would not only threaten future food supplies, but also force smaller producers out of business.
He accused agrochemical firms of conducting a “gigantic experiment with nature and the whole of humanity which has gone seriously wrong…If they think this is the way to go we will end up with millions of small farmers all over the world being driven off their land into unsustainable, unmanageable, degraded and dysfunctional conurbations of unmentionable awfulness. I think it will be an absolute disaster. What we should be talking about is food security not food production - that is what matters and that is what people will not understand. If they think it’s somehow going to work because they are going to have one form of clever genetic engineering after another then count me out, because that will be guaranteed to cause the biggest disaster environmentally of all time.’
Charles’ comments follow a UN International Assessment of Agriculture (IAASTD) report that also had negative findings for GM technology. Carried out by 400 scientists and endorsed by 60 countries it found no conclusive evidence that GM crops increase crop yields. Any benefits were outweighed by an unacceptable environmental and social cost; such as degrading soils, contributing to climate change and failing the world’s poor. The biotechnology industry pulled out of the process when it became clear that the report would not endorse GM crops.
Professor Robert Watson, chief scientist at the UK department of the environment (Defra), said the industrialisation of farming has failed to produce the food needed by the world; instead it has led to the heavy use of chemicals, leeching the soil of nutrients and polluting waterways. Consequently, some 850million people around the world go to bed hungry each night. Prof Watson considers that: ‘We are putting food that appears cheap on our tables but it is food that is not always healthy and that costs us dearly in terms of water, soil and the biological diversity on which our futures depend.’
Friends of the Earth’s Campaign Director Mike Childs said: “Prince Charles has hit the nail on the head about the damaging false solution that GM crops present. GM crops will not solve the food crisis - and forging ahead with an industrialised farming system will continue to fail people and the environment around the world. Global political effort must be channelled into securing long lasting, green farming solutions that put people, not corporations, at their heart - and the UK Government must look at the evidence before falling for GM industry hype.”
The UK Government has been a cheerleader in the EU for GM technology; opposing the labelling of GM foods and supporting U.S. government efforts to have the EU moratorium lifted. In 2001, the then British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, argued that supporting GM technology was vital for Britain’s reputation as a leader in the field of science.
However, trials in the UK during 2003, the largest ever, found GM farming harms the countryside. The spraying regimes for GM oilseed rape and beet killed off weeds, weed seeds and beetles; resulting in food shortages for birds. Moreover, GM pollen was carried up to sixteen miles from farm trial sites, and there were worries that it might damage natural plants.
Polls in the UK have consistently showed opposition to GM products, and a consumer backlash convinced retailers, led by Marks & Spencer and Sainsbury’s, to banish GM ingredients from own-label products.
The Telegraph reported that the Prince’s opposition to GM had received a positive reaction from the vast majority of its readers.