Warriors and Clerics
Sunday, June 7th, 2009A few years ago I stated a simple explanation for the differences in society, theorising that we are still naturally divided into warriors and clerics; two of the main groups that existed in Mediaevel society.
While it may seem better for society to become clerical, and live in peace, this might result in a loss of some of the better characteristics usually acquainted with traditional warriors, such as honour, sacrifice, duty and chivalry.
Bankers and Politicians
The recent scandals involving bankers and politicians can be seen as a clerical society out of control, with no honour, sacrifice, duty or chivalry involved, and the only cause for concern seeming to be how much money they could attain.
I don’t want to be too romantic about warrior culture, as double-dealing and treachery can be a part of wars too, but for the average soldier joining the army and putting their lives at risk, financial reward is one of the least important issues.
World Science
This came back to mind now because a World Science article suggests a ‘warrior gene’ exists.
This suggests that those who get involved with gangs have a visceral urge to fight; as much as those without the gene may abhor physical confrontation.
Conclusion
While society is right to go the way of the cleric rather than the warrior, it should incorporate the good values usually associated with warrior culture; such as honour, duty, sacrifice and chivalry; and not let them be smothered by an obsession with wealth and image.